Not really. Certain institutions have demanded “the internet” be considered equal to basic Will we ever have life requirements like air and water. But this does not mean that the internet is equally as accessible and abundant (after all, clean water is certainly not INTERNET ubiquitous or always free). It still requires an enormous amount of investment to keep the internet infrastructure operating, and the cost for this is not as easily FOR redistributed throughout the complex ecosystem that has sprung up. The benefits the internet brings are in some cases hard to measure or attribute to the “FREE” providers within the ecosystem. ? These market forces are not trivial, as they relate to trillions of dollars in investment and trillions in potential revenue. 112
